Legal Opinion
Potter Instrument Co. v. Performance Improvement Systems, Inc. (In re Potter Instrument Co.)
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 10, 1981No. Bankruptcy Nos. 75-B-864, 75-B-877PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT JOHN HALL, Bankruptcy Judge.
Donald A. Norberg (the “defendant”) moves for an order directing the Clerk to enter a judgment which the defendant contends was rendered in his favor by the late Judge Rudin on April 12,1978. The motion is denied.
Background
Potter Instrument Company, Inc. (“PICO”) and its wholly owned subsidiary *203Potter Data Products Corp. (“PDS”) (collectively the “plaintiffs”) filed petitions for arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act on April 18 and April 22, 1975 respectively. The defendant, as a former employee of both corporations, was owed approximately…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arrow-Hart, Inc. v. Philip Carey Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- In Re California Associated Products Co. Wil-Rud Corporation v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- In Re D'ArcyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Brooklyn Trust Co. v. KelbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- In Re Lee Schoenfield, Bankrupt. Steven H. Dickman, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Lee Schoenfield, Bankrupt v. Lee SchoenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986