Legal Opinion
Powell v. City of Pittsfield
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 23, 2001No. CIV.A. 97-30189-MAPPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted, without opposition. Rulings on the pending motions for summary judgment are as set forth in Section IV. The clerk will set the matter for a status conference.
So ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket Nos. 16, 19, 56, 57 and 61)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Walter J. Powell (“Plaintiff’), believing that the City of Pittsfield (“Pittsfield”) did not rehire him as a police officer quickly enough following his settlement of a prior…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powell v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Powell v. City of PittsfieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Taite v. Bridgewater State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Putnam v. Town of Saugus, Mass.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Butner v. Department of State PoliceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.