Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Toms

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1934No. 4720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff is engaged in the business of selling to individuals who peddle from house to house in their vicinage a full line of household medicines, toilet articles, condiments, novelties, etc. Defendant M. W. Toms from 1927 to 1930 had entered ⅛⅜0 a yearly contract for the purchase and resale of these goods in the parish of Lincoln. On January 15, 1930, he, with Homer A. Toms, E. H. Toms, and Richard Wafer as sureties, again contracted for that year. In the meantime the principal obligor had moved to Bien-ville. Eor this reason, and because he was behind in his account for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murray v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Blanchard v. HaberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Furst v. DeWittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Texas Co. v. CouvillonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Texas Co. v. CouvillonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API