Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Woodruff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1903No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Rohnert, J. Bill by Charles Schwartz against Fremont Woodruff to foreclose a land contract. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This was a suit brought to foreclose a land contract and obtain a decree for a deficiency against defendant. The court below rendered a decree in complainant’s favor. Defendant appeals, asking a reversal, because complainant'only owned an undivided interest in the land in question, and because the deed of complainant’s grantor was acknowledged before an interested party.

The facts are undisputed, and may ,be briefly stated. The contract between complainant and defendant was made October 18, 1892, and obligated complainant to deliver to defendant, on the payment of the agreed purchase price, “a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Laprad v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Bertrand v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Bradway v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Ihlenfeldt v. GuastellaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API