Legal Opinion

First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank v. Page

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. I.,

after stating tbe facts: The plaintiff, a donee beneficiary, and the mortgagors, the Pages, and the grantor, Broadacres Orchard Company, are seeking to hold the grantee, Salvation Army, primarily liable for the mortgage debt on the assumption clause contained in the deed conveying to the Army the equity of redemption in 5,030 acres of land. The briefs are replete with learning on the subject, but the case, in reality, falls within a comparatively narrow compass.

The law undoubtedly is, that when a purchaser of mortgaged lands, by a valid and sufficient contract of assumption,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Cole v. Industrial Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Beaver v. LedbetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. James v. Sartin Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Miller v. . PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. McDonald v. Pend Oreille Mines & Metals Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API