Legal Opinion

McKeany v. Black

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1897No. S. F. No. 500PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from á judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

This action is upon a promissory note made by the defendant, Mary F. Black, to the plaintiff April 15, 1891, payable “ on or before three years after date,” for twelve hundred and twenty-three dollars. A judgment by default was taken against her, and no question is made as to that judgment.

As to the liability of defendant Lilienthal, the complaint, after alleging the making of said note by defendant Black, alleged, in substance, that at the time said *590note was made the defendants were the executrix and executor of the estate of Joseph F. Black, deceased; that the plaintiff was the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Stewart v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. El Rio Oils Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. South Florida Lumber Mills v. BreuchaudCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API