Armour Fertilizer Works v. Sanders
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentHutcheson, Circuit Judge
The conclusion of the majority is in'effect that an inchoate garnishment proceeding by publication, begun in Illinois, limits the general jurisdiction of a federal court in Texas in an interpleader suit to hear, determine, and decree, by compelling it to deny to the head of a Texas family, the homestead exemption which Texas laws guarantee. I feel strongly that the decision, in requiring a Texas court to deprive a Texas family of its homestead exemption to pay a debt incurred and payable in Texas, is harsh and unjust, subversive of the public policy of Texas and its established social order.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.