Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Sigman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 15, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petition, by Armenia Sigman, decedent’s daughter, for the probate of a will alleged to have been lost or destroyed; opposed by Eliza A. Hatch and another. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

This is a proceeding instituted by the petitioner, an illegitimate child of decedent, to establish a will alleged to be lost or destroyed. The right of an interested party to resort to proceedings like the present is occasionally an imperative necessity, and the mode of procedure, the proof required, and the restrictions imposed are statutory in their nature, so that a .brief reference to the laws applicable in such cases will serve to illustrate more clearly the pertinence or deficiencies in the proof presented.

First. Where a will, a/uly executed, has been lost or destroyed, by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marx v. . McGlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Cudney v. . CudneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Jackson v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Betts v. Jackson ex dem. BrownCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hard v. AshleyNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API