Legal Opinion

People v. Hatch

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2000No. S074630Published

1Opinion of the Court

92 Cal.Rptr.2d 80 (2000)

22 Cal.4th 260

991 P.2d 165

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Daniel William HATCH, Defendant and Respondent.

In re Daniel William Hatch, on Habeas Corpus.

No. S074630.

Supreme Court of California.

January 31, 2000.

Gil Garcetti, District Attorney, George M. Palmer, Patrick D. Moran, Brent Riggs and Diana L. Summerhayes, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John J. Reed, Tustin, and Eliseo D.W. Gauna, Van Nuys, for Defendant and Respondent.

BROWN, J.

The primary issue before us is whether the constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy bar retrial…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API