Legal Opinion

Funderburk v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1999No. 92,389Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

¶ 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ issue directing the respondent-judge, or any other judge assigned or to be assigned to Funderburk v. Utica Part Clinic, Cause No. CJ-97-1827, on the docket of the District Court, Tulsa County, forthwith to order that Hillcrest Medical Center deliver for the respondent’s in camera inspection all the insurance and malpractice claims’ information which has been withheld from production. Upon inspection, the respondent-judge shall allow discovery of those materials that pertain to credentialing and peer rfeview activities affecting Dr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buzzard v. McDanelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Strubhart v. Perry Memorial Hospital Trust AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Tuller v. ShallcrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Wisdom v. McCallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API