Condit v. Condit
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
For the defendant wife, the marriage involved in this suit is her fourth. On the other hand, so far as the record discloses, this is only the second for the plaintiff. It may be premised that in that respect they are not in pari delicto. Suffice it to say that after a brief courtship they married in haste and very soon thereafter the plaintiff had cause to repent at his leisure. He seems to have caught a tartar and it is amply proven that on various occasions, she treated him with extreme cruelty, swearing at him, scratching him, biting him and applying to him in the presence of others…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Andrew v. AndrewOregon Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reddington v. ReddingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Claude v. ClaudeOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Fritz v. FritzOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- McKinley v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- McElwee v. McElweeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.