Legal Opinion
In Re Jones
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 15, 1988No. Bankruptcy 87-00804PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION CONCERNING EXPIRATION OP THE AUTOMATIC STAY UNDER 11 U.S.C. SEC. 362(e)
S. MARTIN TEEL, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Capital City Corporation (“Movant”) filed a motion seeking to modify the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. Section 362(a) in order to enforce its security interest in Debtor’s real property in the District of Columbia by way of foreclosure. A preliminary hearing was not held within 30 days of the filing of the motion. Movant contends that the automatic stay expired as a matter of law by reason of 11 U.S.C. Section 362(e).
The preliminary hearing on relief from the automatic stay was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re ClarkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re River Hills Apartments Fund, Debtor. River Hills Associates, Ltd. v. River Hills Apartments FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Jones v. Wood (In Re Wood)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1983
- Navajo Tribe v. Sandmar Corp. (In Re Sandmar Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1981
- United States v. Marine Power & Equipment Co. (In Re Marine Power & Equipment Co.)District Court, W.D. Washington · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Wedgewood Realty Group, Ltd. Wedgewood Investment Fund, Ltd. v. Wedgewood Realty Group, LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- In Re Orfa Corp. of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994