Legal Opinion

Baer v. Eads

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

Motion by plaintiff (1) to confirm the report of the referee in foreclosure; (2) to confirm the report of the *227Official Referee; (3) for judgment of foreclosure, and (4) for an extra allowance. The controversy centers around the fact that two of the defendants are in the military forces and the opposition urges that this foreclosure should be stayed on that account; there is also a question of whether proper service was effected upon the owner of the equity. This action was commenced by filing the Us pendens and complaint on May 12, 1942, and by serving (that will be discussed later) John…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dietz v. TreupelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Queens County Savings Bank v. ThalerNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API