Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holiday v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 22, 1972Published

1DissentOliver, Judge

I must respectfully dissent. The petitioner makes factual allegations with reference to systematic exclusion of members of his race from the indicting grand jury. Only by a thorough evidentiary hearing can the validity of those allegations be determined. If those charges are true his conviction was and is unconstitutional and void.

I pointed out in my dissent in State ex rel. Willie Lee Henderson v. Russell, Tenn.Crim.App., 459 S.W.2d 176, that an indictment returned against a Negro by a grand jury from which members of his race were systematically excluded is unconstitutional and void,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Henderson v. RussellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  2. Willie Lee Henderson v. Lewis S. Tollett, Warden, Brushy Mountain State FarmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  3. Henderson v. TollettDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API