State v. Monroe
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in revoking his probation because the trial court’s findings of fact in the revocation order do not support the conclusion of law that defendant breached a condition of probation by committing a criminal offense. We disagree.
The court does not specifically state whether the criminal offense committed was a violation of G.S. 14-106, obtaining property in return for a worthless check, or G.S. 14-107, the worthless check statute. However, the evidence presented amply supports a finding that defendant violated G.S. 14-107. Defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. . GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State v. DebnamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. CausbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.