Taylor v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
This is a habeas corpus action by a father for the- custody of his six and a half year old son. The defendant is the widow of plaintiff’s deceased brother. A different trial judge from the present one, in a former action, held for the defendant, leaving the child with her. In a few months the- plaintiff then filed the present action, 'and on the hearing much evidence and many witnesses were heard. No -order was made at that time, and subsequently another hearing -was had, at which the plaintiff adduced more evidence. The trial judge in the instant case likewise held for the defendant, and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bishop v. BenearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Yahola v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Panther v. PantherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hamann v. MiesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Osburn v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Gibson v. DorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- RAMEY v. SUTTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Mathews v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Culbertson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.