Morlett v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of tampering with a witness. His punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, was assessed at confinement for life. We affirm.
The State offered evidence to prove that, prior to his indictment for the instant offense, appellant was tried for murder. One of the State’s witnesses against appellant in that trial was Rodolfo Herrera. In the trial of the cause now before us Herrera testified that prior to the murder trial appellant phoned him at least three times and said (in Herrera’s words) “... I better not say…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Ransonette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Bustillos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Nzewi v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Uyamadu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Rodolfo Morlett v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- State v. McCoyNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.