Legal Opinion

United States v. Oscar Dovalina and John Doe, A/K/A Rodolfo Soliz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1976No. 75--1043PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:

Oscar Dovalina and Rodolfo Soliz were convicted of distributing twenty-four grams of cocaine to a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) undercover agent in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 1 At their jury trial, Dovalina testified that he had received the cocaine in question from the same Government informer who had helped to arrange the sale. Defendants’ main contention on appeal is that under United States v. Bueno, 5 Cir., 1971, 447 F.2d 903, the Government’s failure to counter Dovalina’s testimony in this regard with testimony from the informer himself entitled…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Samuel B. Hewitt and Bobby Gene ChesserCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Oscar DovalinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. David AndertonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Douglas B. Cole, James Hawkins, James Hensley, Carl HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API