Legal Opinion

Cleveland Worsted Mills Co. v. Consolidated Textile Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 6, 1923No. 2986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware; Hugh M. Morris, Judge. Suit in equity by the. Cleveland Worsted Mills Company against the Consolidated Textile Corporation. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

[1] The appellant filed a bill in equity in the District Court to compel the defendant to account for certain property and assets alleged to have been transferred to it by the James N. Williamson & Sons Company, hereinafter called the Williamson Company, and to pay $50,000, which it alleged the Williamson Company owed it. The Williamson Company, the alleged debtor of the appellant, was not made a party defendant, and this appeal is brought to review the action of the District Court in dismissing the bill ón that ground.

*130Appellant alleged that the Williamson Company owed it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Moulders Union Local No. 68Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Swan Land & Cattle Co. v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Gaylords v. KelshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Snead v. SchebleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. American Surety Co. v. ConwayDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldman v. Postal Telegraph, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API