Protto v. Protto

We reverse that part of the judgment under review which awarded the wife as lump sum alimony the husband’s one-half interest in a condominium owned by the parties and awarded the husband attorneys’ fees. Where the record reflects that the husband, age sixty, is ill with emphysema rendering him unable to be fully employed, and the forty-five-year-old wife is in good health with some, albeit modest, assets of her own, an award of lump sum alimony of the husband’s one-half interest in the condominium, his only substantial asset as far as this record reflects, is neither fit, equitable nor just.…