Legal Opinion

Heffelman v. Otsego Water-power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to-Allegan. (Arnold, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for overflowing his land. It appeared that in 1866, in consequence of a dispute concerning flowage, an arbitration was had which resulted in an agreement whereby, in consideration of $75, a 99-years’ privilege was granted defendant to raise the water, according to the following terms:

“ The arbitrators have caused a survey to be made, and marks to be made by the county surveyor, which said marks are to designate the height to which the said water-power company, or their successors and representatives, are to raise the dam across the Kalamazoo river, and which marks are…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Smith v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API