Smith v. Wilson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Douglas County. At the times herein named the defendants, Wilson, Ciarle, Morrison, and Thatcher, were copartners doing business in Superior under the firm name of R. F. Wilson & Co. On March 14, 1893, this action was commenced against said defendants, and a writ of attachment issued therein, based upon an affidavit of one of the plaintiffs, from which it appears that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $366.32 over…
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Douglas County. At the times herein named the defendants, Wilson, Ciarle, Morrison, and Thatcher, were copartners doing business in Superior under the firm name of R. F. Wilson & Co. On March 14, 1893, this action was commenced against said defendants, and a writ of attachment issued therein, based upon an affidavit of one of the plaintiffs, from which it appears that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $366.32 over and above all legal setoffs; that the defendants were each and all nonresidents and bad assigned, conveyed, disposed of,…
1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, J.
The proceedings resulting in the entry of the judgment, the issuing and levying of an execution upon the property of the defendants, and the sale thereof by the sheriff, sufficiently appear in the foregoing statement. The order refusing to vacate the judgment and all subsequent proceedings thereon, and to allow the defendants Wilson and Clark to traverse the affidavit for the attachment, is based upon “the affidavits and proofs of the parties.” The affidavits of Wilson and Clark are to the effect that the affidavit for the attachment was wholly and absolutely false and untrue; that the firm…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Salter v. HilgenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Seymour v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Thomas v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Wilkinson v. ReweyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Cole v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keeney v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Cline v. DuffyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Stoll v. PearlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904