Legal Opinion

Home Products Intern., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 17, 2009No. Slip Op. 09-145; Court 08-00094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON, Judge.

This action arises from the second administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering floor-standing metal-top ironing tables from the People’s Republic of China. See Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, 73 Fed.Reg. 14,437 (Dep’t of Commerce Mar. 18, 2008) (final results admin, review) (“Final Results ”), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum for Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, A-570-888 (March 10, 2008), available…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Home Products International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Essar Steel Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  3. Essar Steel Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API