Legal Opinion

Young v. Plattner Implement Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1907No. 5424; No. 3082 C. APublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of the City and County of Denver. Hon. Albert S. Frost, Judge. Action by The Plattner Implement Company against John S. Young and Fred Hays. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

This appeal is from a judgment of the county court rendered upon an appeal from a justice court.

The suit was to recover the amount of a promissory note given by appellants to appellee in payment of a farming implement.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendants moved a nonsuit which was denied. This ruling is assigned as error.

The abstract of record does not embody this motion, so that we are unadvised as to the grounds upon which it was based, except as we gather the same from appellants’ brief, from which it seems *67that it was upon the ground that the incorporation of plaintiff had not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denver & Rio Grande R'y Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Horn v. ReitlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Weil v. NevittSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  4. Joseph Holmes Fuel & Feed Co. v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dominion Oil Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  2. Piccoli v. Paramount Lubricants Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API