Legal Opinion

Bellefleur v. United States Finishing Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The question at issue involves the rights of the parties under a contract. The finding, which is not contested, discloses that this contract was in the form of a written order, executed by the defendant and duly accepted by the plaintiff, and was in form as follows:

“The United States Finishing Company

Engineering Department Providence, It. I.

Date Dec. 21, 1927.

A. C. Bellefleur & Son Co.

% 136 Garfield Ave.,

New London, Conn.

Please send us:

1—36" Bullard Vertical Boring Mill.

This machine to be taken for a 30 day trial. Can be returned if not satisfactory. All as per their Mr. Bellefleur’s letter.

Pr…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Springfield Engine Stop Co. v. SharpMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Isaacs v. MacdonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sommer Metalcraft Corp. v. Indianapolis MacHinery Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API