Legal Opinion

State v. Gary

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Newton Circuit Court. — Hon. F. G. Johnston, Judge. "The defendant is charged as a wine-grower and a failure to prove him to-be such is fatal to a conviction. State v. Douglass, 48 Mo. App. 39; State v. Kurtz, 64 Mo. App. 123; State v. Greene, 26 Mo. App. 626; State v. Barnett, 111 Mo. App. 688-92.

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

The information is bottomed on section 3015, Revised Statutes 1899, by which winegrowers are permitted to sell wine of their own produc*176tion, in any quantity, on their own premises, without taking out a dramshop license: “Provided, this section shall not he so construed as to give any wine-grower the right to sell, give away or otherwise dispose of, or suffer the same to he done on his premises, any wine to any minor without the permission of the parent, master, or guardian of such minor first had and obtained.” The information charges that the defendant, being a wine-grower, did, etc.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BruderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. State v. CoenanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  3. Blair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GallitonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. State v. SebastianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API