Legal Opinion

The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Woodington Electric Company, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance Company, the United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Woodington Electric Company, Inc. v. Globe Electric Company, Inc., T/a M. L. Marshall Electrical Contractors

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1976No. 75-2271PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

545 F.2d 1381

The UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of

WOODINGTON ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Appellee,

v.

UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

The UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of

WOODINGTON ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Appellee,

v.

GLOBE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., t/a M. L. Marshall Electrical

Contractors, Appellant.

Nos. 75-2271, 75-2272.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1976.

Decided Nov. 15, 1976.

E. Kenneth Day, Norfolk, Va. (M. Richard Epps, Day & Summs, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for U. S. for the use and benefit of Woodington Elec. Co., Inc.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States Ex Rel. Altman v. Young Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  4. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. United States ex rel. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Woodbury Granite Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BMD CONTRACTORS v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Md.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. John Doe I, Individually & as Administrator of the Estate of His Deceased Child Baby Doe I, & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Jane Doe I, on Behalf of Herself, as Administratrix of the Estate of Her Deceased Child Baby Doe I, & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated John Doe II John Doe III John Doe IV John Doe v. Jane Doe II Jane Doe III John Doe Vi John Doe Vii John Doe Viii John Doe Ix John Doe X John Doe Xi, on Behalf of Themselves & All Others Similarly Situated & Louisa Benson on Behalf of Herself & the General Public v. Unocal Corporation, a California Corporation Total S.A., a Foreign Corporation John Imle, an Individual Roger C. Beach, an Individual, John Roe III John Roe Vii John Roe Viii John Roe X v. Unocal Corporation Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. BMD Contractors, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011
  4. United States v. Berkley Regional InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  5. Kamphuis Excavators, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API