Legal Opinion

Falls County v. Perkins and Cullum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1990No. 2-89-157-CVPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOE SPURLOCK, II, Justice.

Appellant filed a suit for declaratory judgment, then moved for a non-suit pursuant to TEX.R.CIV.P. 162. The appellees, Perkins and Cullum, moved for relief under rule 162 to recover attorney’s fees. The trial court granted the appellant's request for non-suit but ordered that appellees recover reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and costs of court. Appellant appeals the judgment for attorney’s fees and costs.

We affirm.

Appellant, Falls County, brought suit against appellees under the Texas Declaratory Judgments Act. See TEX.CIV.PRAC. & REM.CODE ANN. sec.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oake v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Heritage Life Insurance Co. v. Heritage Group Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. John Chezik Buick Co. v. Friendly Chevrolet Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. District Judges of Collin County v. Commissioners Court of Collin County, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Howell v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. Dean Foods Co. v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  3. Lyco Acquisition 1984 Ltd. Partnership v. First National Bank of Amarillo, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
  4. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Vega-Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  5. Rosenthal v. Ottis, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API