Legal Opinion

Drainage District 18, Craighead Cty. v. McMeen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Drainage District No. 18 of Craighead County was organized by the county court of that county under the provisions of the statute known as the Alternative System of Drainage Districts, § 3607 et seq., Crawford & Moses’ Digest, and the benefits assessed by the commissioners under the authority of that act were approved and confirmed by the county court in 1919.

After the construction of the improvement, it was found that the lands in the lower or southern end of the district had not received the anticipated benefits, by reason of an insufficient outlet for the drainage, and the commissioners…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Nixon v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Oliver v. Southern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Cordell v. KentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cook v. BevillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Graves v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. McCaa Chevrolet Co. v. Bounds, Admr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Beaver Bayou Drainage District v. Lee-Phillips Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Walther v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API