In re Estate of Dionne
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1DissentSouter, J.
In considering the contestants’ challenge to RSA 547:23 (Supp. 1985) the majority opinion discusses two distinct issues. It evaluates the merits of the statutory policy of providing for special and contested session fees to supplement probate judges’ salaries, and it holds that policy to be repugnant to part I, article 14 of the Constitution of New Hampshire, guaranteeing the “right to obtain right and justice freely, without being obliged to purchase it.”
Although I do not believe that the merits of the statutory policy are subject to our review, I agree nevertheless with the court’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State ex rel. Davidson v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. BasinowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. CushingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Perce v. HallettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.