Legal Opinion · Dissent

Companion v. Touchstone

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1996Published

1DissentSmith, J.

The majority holds that the defendant’s actions constituted a good-faith effort to perform under the real property purchase agreement as a matter of law. Because I believe that on this record good faith is an issue of fact, I dissent.

On March 31, 1993, the parties entered into a contract for the purchase of real property which contained a "mortgage contingency clause” which obligated defendant to "make good faith application for” a $135,000 mortgage without delay. Specifically, the contract provided:

"New Mortgage: By Buyer obtaining at his own cost and expense, a Conventional mortgage in that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cone v. DausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Katz v. SimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Blask v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Silva v. CelellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Lunning v. 10 Bleecker Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API