Bacom v. Reavy
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to compel the reinstatement of petitioners to • positions formerly held by them as motor vehicle Ecense examiners for the Motor Vehicle Bureau of the State Department of Taxation and Finance. Sufficient facts essential to a decision appear to be undisputed.
Petitioners were appointed examiners during the period from February to May in the year 1940, after having qualified for such positions under the State civil service. There is no claim that they had any previous pubEc service.
The interveners, who are designated as incumbents,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of McAneny v. . Bd. of Estimate, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Matter of Horn v. GillespieNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of Miller v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Canfield v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re BacomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944