Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 28, 1822PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case 49.

1Opinion of the Court

*163THIS was a writ of error coram vobis, brought by Clarke and Gaines against Bell, in the court below, to quash a replevin bond. Errors, both of law and of fact, were assigned. The defendant in error demurred, and the court having sustained the demurrer, the plaintiffs moved the court to permit them to amend their assignment of error, by striking out the errors of law ; but the court overruled the motion, and gave judgment for the defendant; from which the plaintiffs have appealed to this court.

2. That the circuit court was correct in sustaining the demurrer, there can be no doubt. It is a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
  2. Bettis v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866
  3. Smalley v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1825
  4. Williams v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API