Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Carroll

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Knox County. • S. T. Logan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The defendant in error, one Carroll, is the head of a family, and lives in Knox County. He owned but two horses, one of which was negligently killed by the railroad. He instituted suit and recovered a judgment against the road for the value of this horse; and this judgment a garnishing creditor sought, by proper process, to subject *662to the satisfaction of his debt. This claim was resisted by the owner of the judgment, on the ground that it stood in the room and stead of the horse so killed, and, as the latter was exempt property, the judgment was equally protected . by § 2931 of the (M. & V.)…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  2. Cleveland v. McCannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Thompson-Ritchie & Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  4. Wabash Railroad v. BowringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Wright v. BrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API