Legal Opinion
Matter of David B.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 2002PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
The common issue on these appeals is the nature of the showing of dangerousness required to retain an insanity acquittee in a non-secure psychiatric facility pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 330.20. Because the records in these cases are unclear as to whether the hearing courts conducted sufficient inquiry or made the necessary findings regarding dangerousness, we reverse and remit to those courts for farther proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
I
Matter of David B.
David B. appeals an order of Supreme Court directing his continued retention in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Matter of George L.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re Harry M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Matter of Francis S.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Jamie R. v. ConsilvioNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Enrique T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Richard S. v. CarpinelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Richard H. v. ConsilvioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Jamie R. v. ConsilvioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.