Legal Opinion
Y-I-M
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2019No. ID 3971PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 724
(BIA 2019) Interim Decision #3971 Matter of Y-I-M-, Applicant Decided December 12, 2019 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) An Immigration Judge may rely on inconsistencies to support an adverse credibility finding as long as either the Immigration Judge, the applicant, or the Department of Homeland Security has identified the discrepancies and the applicant has been given an opportunity to explain them during the hearing. (2) An Immigration Judge may, but is not required to, personally identify an obvious…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Victor Paul v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Sk Shahriair Majidi v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Xiu Xia Lin v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nkenglefac v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- W-E-R-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020
- Pinel-Gomez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- KOATBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2022
- Malets v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.