Legal Opinion

Morris v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1922No. 8 Div. 932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The questions raised as to> the organization of the jury have been settled in Lang v. State, ante, p. 88, 89 South. 164, and are not insisted upon.

The indictment follows the language of the statutes under which the two counts are drawn, and this court has consistently held similar indictments to he sufficient-State v. Dodd, 17 Ala. App. 20, 81 South. 356; Oliver v. State, 16 Ala. App. 533, 79 South. 313; Holt v. State, 16 Ala. App. 399, 78 South. 315. The statute (Acts 1919, p. 1086) prohibits the possession of certain articles to be used for the purpose of manufacturing any prohibited…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oliver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. State v. DoddAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Holt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Lodano v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  5. Mason & Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Troup v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Shouse v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Farmer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Garner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API