Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. James E. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 1, 1972No. 71-1845Published

1ConcurrenceAdams, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result reached in this case. In addition, I feel that the pre-sentence commitment procedure utilized by the trial judge merits some comment.

Appellant contends that following the conclusion of his trial the district court ordered that he be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for observation and study, and that pursuant to such order he was removed from the courtroom without an opportunity to notify his family and incarcerated incommunicado for a period of approximately ninety days.

Section 4208(b) of Title 18, U.S.C. provides:

“(b) If the court desires more detailed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolack v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1963
  2. Bennett Gordon Iler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. YorkDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API