Legal Opinion

Shiner v. Shiner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. Robert B. Green.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

Emma Shiner died, disposing of her property by will substantially in the following manner: She directed her executors to collect the money due her, and, after payment of all debts, to divide the same. All her other property she required to be divided into six equal parts, and left one part to her daughter Mrs. Brady, and to each of her sons W. B. Shiner, M. K. Shiner and H. B. Shiner. To the children of another son, M. C. Shiner, she gave one-sixth, and to the children of another son, J. V. Shiner, one-sixth. She directed that as soon as practicable her executors should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Heath v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Shiner v. ShinerTexas Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Uehlinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Kidd v. PrinceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Maddux v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Kidd v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Leach v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API