Z. v. Oxford Health Plans
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH JONATHAN Z. and DANIEL Z., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. ON PLAINTIFFS’ PARITY ACT CLAIMS OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, Case No. 2:18-cv-00383-JNP-JCB Defendant. District Judge Jill N. Parrish Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett This action arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA),
29 U.S.C. § 1001
et seq. Defendant Oxford Health Plans (“Oxford”) administered claims for mental health and substance abuse benefits under plaintiffs Jonathan Z. and Daniel…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Thole v. U. S. Bank N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.