Legal Opinion

Z. v. Oxford Health Plans

District Court, D. Utah

Decided August 9, 2022No. 2:18-cv-00383Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH JONATHAN Z. and DANIEL Z., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. ON PLAINTIFFS’ PARITY ACT CLAIMS OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, Case No. 2:18-cv-00383-JNP-JCB Defendant. District Judge Jill N. Parrish Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett This action arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq. Defendant Oxford Health Plans (“Oxford”) administered claims for mental health and substance abuse benefits under plaintiffs Jonathan Z. and Daniel…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Thole v. U. S. Bank N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API