Legal Opinion

State v. Jaime

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1963No. 36629PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Appellant was tried and convicted on two counts: (1) rape committed against the will of, and’ without the consent of, the prosecuting witness who was then unconscious of the nature of the act, which fact was known to appellant, and (2) second-degree burglary committed under circumstances not amounting to first-degree burglary by entering the dwelling house of another with intent to commit some crime therein.

The trial court denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the case at the close of the state’s evidence. Appellant did not take the stand nor present any evidence. He made the usual post-trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. RosencransWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. GilmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. FalsettaWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State v. KirkbyWashington Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KreckWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Charles Kreck v. James SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Charles Kreck v. James SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API