Legal Opinion

Adams, Judge v. Slavin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 15, 1928PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing.

This is a suit under the Declaratory Judgment Act (Acts 1922, c. 83) to have determined four questions. They are: (1) Is the act of the General Assembly of 1928, known as Senate Bill No. 153, and entitled: “An act repealing section 1731, Kentucky Statutes, Carroll’s 1922 Edition, in so far as same applies to county judges and enacting in lieu thereof an act fixing and regulating the fees of county judges in civil cases and disposing of costs in criminal cases and the fines and forfeitures in such courts and providing the method of fixing the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Hargis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Ezzell v. ExallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  4. Wagers v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Bonar v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jefferson County Ex Rel. Coleman v. ChiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Coleman, Auditor v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Black v. Elkhorn Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Wright v. Nashville Gas & Heating Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Coleman v. HenryTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API