Legal Opinion

Brittney Gault v. Charles Schwab Corporation, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 19, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00747Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brittney Gault, No. CV-23-00747-PHX-KML 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Charles Schwab Corporation, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 After the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants they filed a bill of 16 costs. (Doc. 91.) If plaintiff Brittney Gault wished to object to that bill, Local Rule 54.1(b) 17 required she do so “[w]ithin fourteen (14) days after service of the bill of costs.” Gault did 18 not file an objection. On November 25, 2025, the Clerk of Court entered a taxation 19 judgment against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Combined Metals Reduction Company, Debtor (Ten Cases). Irving Bennett v. Paul Gemmill, Trustee, (Four Cases). Irving Bennett v. W. Lamonte Robison, Trustee, (Four Cases). Irving Bennett v. Paul Gemmill, Trustee, Jeremiah Milbank, and Milbank & Co., Irving Bennett, Entrada Industries, Inc. (Wasatch Chemical Division), Charles A. Steen, Individually, Charles A. Steen, as Custodian for His Sons and Heirs, and Charles A. Steen on Behalf of the Steen Foundation v. Paul Gemmill, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Joseph Dillon v. City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Fowler v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API