Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy Committee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1989No. 55952-0Published

1ConcurrenceUtter, J.

(concurring in the result)—I agree with the majority that, given the facts of this case, Const, art. 1, § 5 (hereinafter section 5) does not allow the petitioners the right to solicit donations and memberships within a private shopping mall. The majority's rationale for reaching this result, however, is one with which I cannot agree.

*435In applying the interpretive criteria we developed in State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54, 720 P.2d 808 (1986),48 I find a different basis for our common result. There simply is no compelling reason why we should append a state action requirement to section 5 when the…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API