State v. Vallo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The indictment accused defendant of the unlawful killing of Ronnie Baca. There is proof that defendant unlawfully killed a boy. There is no proof that this boy was Ronnie Baca. In the absence of such proof, is defendant’s conviction of involuntary manslaughter to be sustained?
The State contends that proof of the identity of the victim is surplusage. See § 41-6-36, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6). Its position is that it need only prove the corpus delicti, and that the corpus delicti does not include the identity of the victim. We disagree.
State v. Chaves, 27 N.M. 504, 202 P. 694…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. PekeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. ChavesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GruenderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. MalouffNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. MoraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. CoulterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.