Legal Opinion

George Ringler & Co. v. Mohl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Henry Mold, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 30th day of August, 1906, enjoining and restraining the defendant, during the pendency of this action, from buying and selling upon the premises mentioned in the complaint any beer other than that brewed by the plaintiff. „ '

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

This action is brought to enforce a written agreement whereby the defendant agreed that he would “ buy, use and sell upon the premises, viz.1, fl 2103 First Avenue, Borough of Manhattan, City .of Hew York, and more fully described herein, the beer brewed by George Ringler & Co., and their successors and assigns, and only such ales as may be. approved for and during the.full and. unexpired term of the lease aforesaid, viz., Fifteen years from Janpary 1st, 1906 ; * * "" and should said Henry Mohl fail to buy, use and sell upon said premises such ales as may be apjiroved, of buy and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lakes Island Realty Co. v. McDermottNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Pabst Brewing Co. v. SloaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Crawford v. NewmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. George Ringler & Co. v. MohlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Johnson v. Bruckhart, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API