Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brown v. Rudy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2018No. Docket No. 335923Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Beckering, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

One of our most treasured rights as adults is the freedom of association: the ability to spend time with whatever group or person we desire. But what happens when we are no longer cognitively able to discern for ourselves who is a friend and who is a foe, even though both may be sweet and endearing? This case is about the propriety of a personal protection order (PPO) issued against respondent, Michael Rudy, to protect petitioner, Kay Windram Brown, from her own vulnerability to manipulation and exploitation due to Alzheimer's disease.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Redd v. Carney (In re Redd)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Bloomfield Township v. KaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API