Legal Opinion

Vinning v. Astrue

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided October 29, 2009No. 3:08-cv-00059PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN McBRYDE, District Judge.

Before the court for decision in each of the consolidated actions shown in the caption is a motion by Elizabeth B. Dunlap (“Dunlap”) for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and, in two of the actions, for costs and expenses under the EAJA. The court has concluded that each of the motions should be dismissed as to the fee requests, that the costs requests should be granted, and that the expenses requests should be dismissed.

I

The Consolidated Actions

The styles, case numbers, and abbreviated…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API