Legal Opinion
Baxter, Trustee v. Village of Manchester
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillen, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action in the Court of Common Pleas of Adams county, Ohio, to recover from defendant the sum of $18,317.20, which amount is claimed to he due for hydrant rentals from March 20, 1929, to March 20, 1934. The issues were submitted to the trial court without the intervention of a jury, resulting in a judgment for defendant. The cause is before this court on an appeal on questions of law..
The amended petition alleges that the village of Manchester on the 27th day of June, 1927, granted a franchise to H. L. Fuller pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 95 duly passed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bissell v. CouchaineOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- Defiance Water Co. v. City of DefianceOhio Supreme Court · 1903
- McGonigale v. City of DefianceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1905
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andres v. City of PerrysburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State ex rel. Fahrman v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Pilot Oil Corp. v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shapely, Inc. v. City of Norwood Earnings Tax Board of AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Whiteco Metrocom, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.