Legal Opinion

United States v. Monroe Foreign Forwarding Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1930No. 3256Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal .from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

Merchandise, consisting of cotton gloves with three lines of needlework composed of cotton threads superimposed on the cotton fabric and appearing on the back of each glove, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of St. Louis as “articles embroidered in any manner by hand or machinery” at 75 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1430 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

Par. 1430. * * * embroideries not specially provided for, and all fabrics and articles embroidered in any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kayser & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Kotzin Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Sloane v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. United States v. Grass Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Mayer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API